It really depends on the monitors. These monitors, the answer would be NO simply because they don't have great bass response (tiny woofer) but they would be pretty "accurate" monitors, meaning you could trust them. When mixing, you don't want "great sound" you really want "accurate sound" which is where folks often miss it in home recording. Folk just use what is at hand snd sometimes that means mixing on ear buds which are not very accurate and it makes your mix not "travel" very well when played on other systems.
So in short, it can sound very nice and accurate depending on how much money one spends. But for under $200, you can get better quality in headphone than in monitors. However, headphones distort the stereo field and are not great for mixing. Generally, they are used to "spot check" a mix to find errors.
These little mackies would be good starters for folks with no real monitors. You'd want to add a subwoofer at some point to take care of the bass and hopefully it would be "matched" meaning a mackie subwoofer that takes up where these leave off
But just to offer an idea, you could always grab the KRK 8 monitors which have an 8 inch woofer and thus plenty of bass. They are actual monitors and great for home recording. Also, they have plenty of bass so you can go without a sub. If you get KRK 5 or KRK 6, you will probably want to add a sub simply because they drop off near the low/bass frequencies.
The ADAM speakers mentioned are very nice but not cheap. Also, you probably want to get the adam 7 or bigger to sound "good" without adding a sub and they run nearly double the cost of the KRK.
Todd
seems like a pretty decent price
do studio monitors give you the same quality you get from listening through headphones?
for example, I play through a ux1 via headphones and it sounds really good but if I put my ux1 through my stereo ( or PC ) speakers..... it doesnt sound nearly as good.