QUOTE (Daniel Robinson @ Jul 27 2008, 04:50 AM)
When dealing with things like this on a philosophical level it always stirs up emotions.
I am generally tolerant of most things, but there does come a time when you have to draw a line in the sand. The addage of "Live and let live". I belive it to only a small extent. I believe a person has the right to live how they want as long as it doesnt hurt others physically or emotionally.
This is not judging people per se, it is defining what is hurtful and what is not. Sitting on the fence is not the answer, indecision and Live and let live policy is what allows things to spiral out of control.
I think Edmund Burke put it best "The easiest way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing".
So in that respect the whole idea of Live and let live doesnt hold up. People need to have deep conviction of their own values and need to take a stand against things they perceive to be wrong. Not just simply stand on the sidelines and ignore it.
Daniel
To continue being philosophical and taking that reasoning to an extent too. I'm not using "you" as a reference to you, just generally speaking.
What defines a "good man"?
Your moral? He's moral? My moral? That he acts with violence when he think's it's time to stand up for what's right? Drawn to the extent it have to come to violence because you can't reason everybody to think like you do.
Who should have the right to use violence to resolv a conflict? Everone? A selected few? Who pick those few? Political leaders? Religous leaders? The richest dudes? The poorest?
When moral values differ, who judges which one is right? What gives you the right to decide that your moral values are right and he's are wrong?
"Drawing a line" could well start a world war. Conflicts, armed conflicts too, often start out of different moral standards and "drawn lines". Conflicts aren't necessarily bad, but I would say armed ones usually are.
"I believe a person has the right to live how they want as long as it doesn't hurt others physically or emotionally."
Yepp. So do I. To an extent. Everyone have to give in and be a little "hurt" because my freedom will surely contradict your freedom sooner or later. And I call that "Live and let live".
I would change that line simply to "I believe a people should have the right to live their life in freedom in whichever way they choose." Or something in the line of that Emphasising "should" because it's the ultimate, an unreachable goal. Noone can have total freedom, whether it hurts others or not. As long as we live in a society we have to have rules and share and contribute. That also includes not limiting others freedom by forcing my freedom upon them.
Freedom also brings up another philosofical issue.
Has a person right to his own life and body? To do with whatever he please?
I have to go, didn't have time to complete it the way I wanted. Hope it didn't all turn out jibberish.
You are at GuitarMasterClass.net
Don't miss today's
free lick. Plus all our lessons are packed with
free content!