Axe Fx Ii Vs Kemper Profiling Amp |
|
Axe Fx Ii Vs Kemper Profiling Amp |
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2013, 08:41 PM |
Thanks a lot guys! I'm learning a lot about both units this way.
How about their tone for direct recording, going straight to the audio interface? Which unit works better in this scenario or they are both equal? Just based on reviews and features, I'm leaning towards Kemper.... though I don't think I'll be getting any of these two units soon (I first need to upgrade my audio recording setup and bass oriented gear). -------------------- For GMC support please email support (at) guitarmasterclass.net
Check out my lessons and my instructor board. Check out my beginner guitar lessons course! ; Take a bass course now! |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Jun 27 2013, 05:15 PM |
How about their tone for direct recording, going straight to the audio interface? Which unit works better in this scenario or they are both equal? As you know, that's an extremely complicated question to answer. You should be skeptical of anyone who tells you the tone of one is "better" than the other. Both are capable of extremely high fidelity emulations of amps and cabinets. They can even do excellent emulations of each other. Now that both have tone matching capabilities and both are rack mountable, they're getting even more similar. The differences are the things that have been mentioned above like routing, effects, I/O, editor, presets, parameter control, retail distribution, etc. -------------------- Cyber-industrial music and video animations:
https://vimeo.com/channels/thedignitymachine https://vimeo.com/channels/somewheretohide Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RodrigoSpacecraft |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Jun 27 2013, 05:19 PM |
Axe has a direct USB recording which is awesome.. I m using it as an audio interface itself.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 30 2013, 09:14 PM |
With all due respect I have to agree to disagree that "with most modelers a good sounding combination is almost impossible to achieve." as the combination of an overdrive like the dead horse or even a keeley tube screamer sounds AMAZING with the Axe FX and with various software modelers. I use OVERLOUD TH2 with a BULB DELUXE OD in front and it's just the heaviest thing I've ever heard to be honest.
Misha Mansoor from Periphery turned me on to this idea of pre amping a sim with a OD and it's been great. Here is a recent track where I used the Bulb Deluxe in front of the Overloud TH2 plugin. I have yet to find a real amp that could reproduce this type of tone since the frequency range on the guitar tone is just so broad. Dipping in to bass guitar territory and up to about 6k. https://soundcloud.com/techniqueswithtodd/solo-backing-track-six-demon For sure bith units will satisfy anyone of us I believe. What I like about the Kemper is the fact that it has a special send return mode for distortion and overdrive pedals. As a collector I own many of them and with most modelers a good sounding combination is almost impossible to achieve. This is possible with the Kemper which is a big PLUS for me.
BTW: i own a THR-x rightnow and i am amazed how great this little practice amp sounds |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 04:22 AM |
Short Answer? GET A KEMPER Simple reason is this requirement you mentioned/ "want to be able to play on tones that are precise replicas of guitar tones from previous recordings" That's what a kemper does. People do the profiling for you and post the patches for free online which is handy The axe fx has a similar feature but it's not quite as accurate. If you really are more focused on the actual tones, get a kemper. Simple as that It's the most accurate emulation of real amps on the market IMHO. But if you have any number of other requirements, then I'd say axe fx. But you don't seem to so kemper Thanks Todd. I was totally on the same page as you until a couple of days ago, when I was on YouTube to check out different samples of the Kemper and Axe FX. I came across this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntyDuejehLc This replica tone of Master of Puppets was created with the Axe Fx II, and sounds absolutely spot on. So do his tones for all of Metallica's albums. The way the creator of the video describes it, the Axe Fx excels better at recreating tones from records in the past, like Master of Puppets or Ride the Lightning, by tweaking the endless parameters to your liking. While the Kemper can profile a live amp, the Axe Fx has the parameters to tweak to recreate a tone of the past more accurately. Since my needs are creating tones of the past, is the Axe Fx superior in that regard? I know that the Kemper can profile a live amp in a studio setting, but could it profile a recording of guitar that a band made in 1985? -------------------- |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 12:28 PM |
Rawragh! I own the Kemper, must come in to add the battles between the 2! Fight and flames begin now!
Remember when you try to get the tone of a record it is more than just amps. It deals with mics and so on. Look at Metallica they don't use the same amps they did in the 80s as now. Heck Kirk uses I believe a Fortin Amp that Randall built, he still can rock the same exact tones he did back then now. They are doing a concert (or have done) in Antarctica using an Axe FX-II. I am in no way upset with going from a real tube amp to my Kemper. I know recording is way easier. I also use a PA Speaker for playing loud, which is rare. I typically just turn on the Kemper, click open Reaper, toss on my headphones. Make 2 tracks, 1 for a backing or drums (my metronome) and a track for my guitar. Then look at the clock and I lose 2+ hours. I bought the Kemper over the Axe due to everyone saying you just click a tone maybe move the eq on it like a real amp and done with it. I always viewed the Axe more like my old Line 6 gear, have to edit it up before I can use it. Anymore they are both all over artists use both, recording studios use both. NiN, Trivium, Jimmy Buffet, Keith Merrow, Depeche Mode, ECT - Kemper Periphery, Devin Townsend, Jeff Loomis, Guthrie Govan, Steve Vai, ECT - AXE FX So in the end you get a top notch item! I bet either way you go you won't be let down. -------------------- Guitars:
Ibanez S770PB (Natural Flat) , Ibanez XPT700 (Chameleon) , Sterling J Richardson Signature , Squire IV Jazz Bass (Sunburst) Gear: Neural DSP Plugins My YouTube Page. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Dec 12 2013, 05:12 PM |
IMHO. You really can't rely on youtube for critical listening. It's just too compressed and processed to be relied upon for detailed listening. Get in front of a KEMPER and an AXE and and trust your ears I've heard both up close and while I personally would choose the axe fx for it's flexibility, the KEMPER edges it out in terms of "Tone Clone", IMHO, but that's just one guy with one set of ears. It sounds like you are now leaning toward the axe fx though which is the one I'd pick. But either way, you'll be in good shape.
Thanks Todd.
I was totally on the same page as you until a couple of days ago, when I was on YouTube to check out different samples of the Kemper and Axe FX. I came across this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntyDuejehLc This replica tone of Master of Puppets was created with the Axe Fx II, and sounds absolutely spot on. So do his tones for all of Metallica's albums. The way the creator of the video describes it, the Axe Fx excels better at recreating tones from records in the past, like Master of Puppets or Ride the Lightning, by tweaking the endless parameters to your liking. While the Kemper can profile a live amp, the Axe Fx has the parameters to tweak to recreate a tone of the past more accurately. Since my needs are creating tones of the past, is the Axe Fx superior in that regard? I know that the Kemper can profile a live amp in a studio setting, but could it profile a recording of guitar that a band made in 1985? This post has been edited by Todd Simpson: Dec 12 2013, 05:16 PM |
|
|
||