Hey guys! I was wondering about making some review of mostly used interfaces combined with which hardware and what type of connection (Firewire or USB).
I wonder about the effective working of those. Especially within people who makes mixes of ful;ly packed sessions - like full band, all on VST + all mixing plugs....
Try to write
1. Interface
2. Conncetion type
3. Operating System
4. PC processor and RAM
5. Number of instruments mixed in the session
Fully packed, mostly plugins/"in the box" recording.
Tascam M164UF USB mixer/interface
(usually 1 track at a time but I've done 8 tracks at once with no issues)
Mac OS X Mavericks
Quad core i7 8GB ram
6 through 24 instruments.
Plugins
*Ez Drummer
*TH2
*Native Instruments Kontact (strings/etc.)
*Izotope Ozone Advanced (on the two bus)
That's about it
1. Line 6 UX1
2. USB
3. OSX 10.9
4. DDR3 10GB
5. Normaly I use addictive drums, Native Instruments Komplete 9 no more than 2 tracks, Guitars 2 tracks for each section, and sometimes a recored bass or a Komplete 9 Bass, and vocals sometimes duplicate.
1. Line 6 UX2
2. USB
3. Windows 7 / 64 bits
4. Intel I3 2130 / 4GB DDR3
5. I use Guitar Rig and I record track by track. For the rest of instruments I use my keyboard and my electronic drums not VST. I mix around 6-10 tracks for a song.
1. Interface - AD/DA IO loop - Prism Sound Orpheus http://www.prismsound.com/music_recording/products_subs/orpheus/orpheus_home.php and reviewed http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep08/articles/prismorpheus.htm . It costs about 4000 Euros.
A Lavry Black DA11 http://www.lavryengineering.com/products/pro-audio/da11.html and a review http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/lavry/dac.html. The Lavry is dedicated to playback about 1500 Euros.
2. Connection type - Prism Orpheus is on FW. Lavry is on the XLR AES-EBU.
3. Operating System - Win 7 64. We use Sadie for the DAW.
4. PC processor and RAM - I3, 3 gig.
5. Number of instruments mixed in the session - mainly mastering so just the 2 bus.
Very little vsts as we use analogue hardware for the majority of our processing. What vsts we have are from Flux, Sonoris and Algorythmix. We also use Izotope RX3 for off line audio cleanup. VSTIs - some use of Vienna samples using Halion as a sampler, Spectrasonics Atmosphere for pads but we usually use 'real' synths, drums, etc.
If I'm recording/mixing though this gives us 8 channels and we can daisy chain a second Orpehsu on the FW for 16 channels. To add more channels the pc also holds 2 legacy RME 9652 HDSP cards internally http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_hdsp_9652.php and we have a Yamaha O1V consolehttp://www.yamahaproaudio.com/global/en/products/mixers/01v96vcm/ to take us to about 56 channels in to the RMEs on lightpipe connection for ada i/o and use the Lavry to monitor via AES. Yes we have done this and yes it does work. We've recorded and mixed live choral and large jazz ensembles this way.
1. M-Audio Fast Track
2. USB 2.0
3. Windows 7 64-bit
4. Intel i7 3GHz and 4GB
5. It really depends on the song, but normally my songs are pretty 'full' by the time they are finished.
EZDrummer
Reaktor 5
Arturia Mini V
Sampletank
SampleMoog
I keep my buffer levels one down from the lowest, which helps keep my system stable.
But how many of You use direct monitoring while recording guitar through VST amp ? That's what I do
I am very curious to hear the explanation for direct monitoring but I know this means: ( but maybe I'm wrong).
Passing a track’s input signal on to the track’s output. Suppose you have set up an audio track to receive it's input signal from a guitar. Monitoring then means that the signal from your live guitar playing actually reaches the track’s output, via the track’s device chain. If the track’s output is set to “Master“, you can hear the guitar signal, processed by whatever effects are used (and delayed by whatever latency the audio hardware interface incurs), over your speakers.
it's been a KILLER interface and you can get them cheap now since they were discontinued. I LOVE have EQ BEFORE the signal gets in to the computer. Also, each channel has a fader and a mic trim. So much like a standard mixing board, and it will let you record 8 tracks at once no problem.
I set the BUFFER @ 64 SAMPLES.
I don't get any latency which is important when playing fast/precise bits. The computer behind the scenes has a lot to do with it as does the driver. I"m not running a separate driver in my case since none exists for the current version of MAC OS X MAVERICKS. It just sees the mixer without an external driver.
IT's a QUAD CORE i7 3.6ghz 8GB Ram which does a great job. I do have to increase the buffer on my laptop a LOT. But it's only a dual core i5 with 4gb ram which is IMHO just not enough horsepower for the stuff I like to run in a channel strip so I"m upgrading the ram and putting in an SSD drive so the swap file will be nearly as fast as the ram.
Todd
I'm using an i5 2.67ghz cpu with 4gb of ram on 32bit windows 7. I'm using a konnect 8 from tc electronic (firewire).
I do lessons with it, me and the student total 2 channels at 96khz and use 6 plug-ins each. 2 of them are upsampled and the cab emulation comes from nebula. Works great, soundcard latency is 1.3 and total latency is 2.0ms.
I'm also ok with freezing tracks, specially vsti's if I'm going to play guitar and latency is disturbing.
1. Presonus USB AudioBox
2. USB 1.1
3. Windows 7 Ultimate
4. AMD FX-8150 (3.6Ghz 8-core) 16Gb Ram
5. 2-5 Tracks.
Setup 1: (2) Tracks - Backtracking or metronome in 1 track and a guitar in the other.
Setup 2: Drums in 1, then dual rhythm and sometimes dual lead.
I also only use headphones when recording, don't even own monitors.
Very happy since I can get around slightly with simple recording. Just think I need to upgrade my interface some day.
Interesting topic! This is what I use at home.
1. Interface
M-audio Fast Track Pro
POD Line 6 HD500
2. Connection type
USB
3. Operating System
Windows 7
4. PC processor and RAM
I7 3.40 GHZ- 8GB Ram
5. Number of instruments mixed in the session
Most of the times the classic rock formation: Drums, Bass, 2/3/4 guitars, and sometimes vocals. I usually add other synth instruments.
Did you do that windows performance setting thing where you tweak some services? its been such a long time but I remember taking the time trying to disable stuff thats on the task manager so I don't get cpu spikes and save some ram.
Of Course no virus program always open (I scan with malwarebytes when needed), even use the lowest graphics settings and a black background its doesn't look cool but I notice a difference.
My soundcard is the oldest of TC electronics range. I think 1-2 years ago they made an update to the driver which made a difference, besides buffer rate there is mode selection that has safe-normal and low latency in it. I use low latency but say if I open chrome while DAW is playing a music it can sometimes have an effect on sound.
But take a backup before trying these if you haven't yet also updating drivers (like usb, mainboard) or even bios helps too.
Yep I tried those. I'm one of those guys who keep constant care of pc health. My Win 7 looks like 98 now Blank background, grey toolbars, now effects etc. I do mess with the start-up progs and services a lot I did some drivers reinstallation and win updates. Not satisfied with results. I own Asus K50J at work with 4GB Ram an Intel T4200 dual core. Audio box is the only thing I can make working the way I need by far
I will be grateful!
I Monitor everything through LIVE use of all my plugins including the MASTER BUS processing and I have zero perceptible latency
.
With my samples set at 64, I'm able to use OVERLOUD on 8 tracks at at time, along with OZONE on the master bus, and a variety of other plugins and it just works perfectly. It's wonderful to be able to record through the plugins and hear the tone as it happens without having any sort of slap back/latency.
TRICKS OF THE TRADE!!:
I"m using LOGIC X ( 64 Bit ) running on MAVERICKS OS X 10.9 (64 Bit) and it's sooo smooth and fast I don't know how I got by without it. I used to have timeline hiccups and now that I've upgrded logic and OS X that's stopped. The only time I have any issues is when using REAPER 64 bit. It does not seem to be as smooth as LOGIC X but then again, APPLE makes LOGIC and they make the operating system and hardware it runs on so it should be smooth
I"ve been using the new GARAGE BAND too and it looks almost the same as LOGIC X. I'm still a big proponent of REAPER cause it will run on anything. But honestly, for anyone considering a new machine, I'd suggest a mac Mini, Mac Laptop, or imac and a copy of LOGIC X. EVen on my underpowered macbook laptop, (dual core slow chip, only 4 gb ram) logic runs very smooth and has just about every plugin you can think of built in from the factory. EVen has a great guitar emulator.
The only plugins I use consistently anymore are TH2, and OZONE. Everything else is built in to Logic!! Now and then I"ll use EZ MIX GUITAR GODS or S-GEAR just to mix things up
LOGIC is so complete and so good that it's really a quantum leap forward IMHO in home recording technology. Sort of like how the AXE FX was a bit jump ahead in terms of hardware modellers. The best news is that LOGIC X only costs $200!! Which is cheaper than I paid for one copy of OZONE!!
Todd
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)