Brand Entry Level Guitars, Do they damage their name |
|
Brand Entry Level Guitars, Do they damage their name |
|
|
|
|
Jun 21 2014, 06:29 AM |
I was just looking at a email shot I received from a guitar shop, advertising Jackson Limited Edition JS23 Dinky Archtops for£129.
Now I don't know anything about this guitar but going by the price I assuming it's an entry level model. It made me wonder whether some of the quality brands are damaging their reputation by not having a clear distinction in name between their entry level guitars and their standard high quality guitars (I'm not talking about the really high Custom Shop guitars here). I can see from a marketing point of view they are using the good name they made for themselves to sell the lower end stuff, so guitarists can brag about playing a Jackson guitar, so think they can buy with confidence even though the price point is low, but it's confusing if you are trying to get a clear picture of the brands range. Fender have so many models of their two main guitars, but they have Squier, which separates the entry level from the rest by brand name, much like Gibson has Epiphone, Musicman has the By Sterling series etc. Ibanez have at least categorised theirs into ranges, so you know what is what. -------------------- My SoundCloud
Gear Tyler Burning Water 2K Burny RLG90 with BK Emeralds Fender US Tele with BK Piledrivers Epiphone 335 with Suhr Thornbuckers PRS SE Custom 24-08 Ax8 Fessenden SD10 PSG Quilter TT15 |
|
|
||