Ice |
mwahahahaha! |
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2017, 12:37 AM
|
|
here is some more science from ETH Zurich , A Global warming science /university etc in Switzerland
https://www.ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-...ng-a-break.html Even they concede that Global warming is taking a break |
 |
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2017, 07:04 AM
|
|
Still dancing around the question a bit CRSN and RICH, what draws you to the other side of this particular argument?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2017, 01:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE (Todd Simpson @ Jun 29 2017, 07:04 AM)  Still dancing around the question a bit CRSN and RICH, what draws you to the other side of this particular argument? Conclusion Regardless of any unsettled science details, it seems sure that current climate models cannot represent what is actually happening in the atmosphere -- and therefore one should not rely on predictions from such unvalidated models that are based simply on increases of carbon dioxide. It should be obvious that this discussion has important policy consequences since so many politicians are wedded to the idea that CO2 needs to be controlled in order to avoid “dangerous changes of the global climate.” S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project. His specialty is atmospheric and space physics. An expert in remote sensing and satellites, he served as the founding director of the US Weather Satellite Service and, more recently, as vice chair of the US National Advisory Committee on Oceans & Atmosphere. He is a Senior Fellow of the Heartland Institute and the Independent Institute. He co-authored NY Times best-seller Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years. In 2007, he founded and has chaired the NIPCC Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/20...l#ixzz4lOULtW1V Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 2 2017, 07:20 AM
|
|
So bottom line is that you are attracted to the other side of this argument because you feel politicians will use it, if accepted, to do what exactly? CRSN?
Still waiting on RICH for his reply on the "Why"?  QUOTE (jstcrsn @ Jun 29 2017, 08:31 AM) Conclusion
Regardless of any unsettled science details, it seems sure that current climate models cannot represent what is actually happening in the atmosphere -- and therefore one should not rely on predictions from such unvalidated models that are based simply on increases of carbon dioxide. It should be obvious that this discussion has important policy consequences since so many politicians are wedded to the idea that CO2 needs to be controlled in order to avoid “dangerous changes of the global climate.” S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project. His specialty is atmospheric and space physics. An expert in remote sensing and satellites, he served as the founding director of the US Weather Satellite Service and, more recently, as vice chair of the US National Advisory Committee on Oceans & Atmosphere. He is a Senior Fellow of the Heartland Institute and the Independent Institute. He co-authored NY Times best-seller Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years. In 2007, he founded and has chaired the NIPCC Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/20...l#ixzz4lOULtW1V Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook This post has been edited by Todd Simpson: Jul 2 2017, 07:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2017, 02:43 AM
|
|
go ahead, lets see your science to disprove this |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2017, 08:11 AM
|
|
It's time to close this topic. We have come back to embedded youtube videos and no factual arguments - which means the discussion is over.
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
