Can Chords Be Replaced By Single Notes?
richardb
Jan 13 2012, 01:58 AM
GMC:er
Posts: 30
Joined: 7-January 12
Hi, as I havent learnt to play chords yet, I was wondering if any piece of

music that involves chords can be played with each chord replaced

by some ordinary note cool.gif

or can a chord note only be done with the chord's group of notes played

simultaneously? mad.gif


if each chord can be replaced by an ordinary note to achieve

the same tune how is that done?

do you replace by the chord by say the deepest note of the chord? biggrin.gif

You are at GuitarMasterClass.net


Don't miss today's free lick. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!

Don't miss today's free blues, jazz & country licks. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Cosmin Lupu
Jan 16 2012, 09:31 AM
Instructor
Posts: 22.808
Joined: 14-June 10
From: Bucharest
I agree with Ben and I must add that theory is actually the grammar of music smile.gif if you don't know grammar you can't use a language properly, am I right?

It will only help you better express your ideas, not under any circumstance limit your creativity, so give it a go, step by step..and yes, Bear Rose's series are a very good recommendation for a healthy start wink.gif

let us know how things are going

Cosmin

You are at GuitarMasterClass.net


Don't miss today's free lick. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!

Don't miss today's free blues, jazz & country licks. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
richardb
Jan 17 2012, 04:11 AM
GMC:er
Posts: 30
Joined: 7-January 12
QUOTE (Cosmin Lupu @ Jan 16 2012, 08:31 AM) *
I agree with Ben and I must add that theory is actually the grammar of music smile.gif if you don't know grammar you can't use a language properly, am I right?


nope!

I dont know anything at all about english grammar but I KNOW if something is correct or not WITHOUT having
to think about it! grammar would really slow me down to the point of nonfluency.

the correctness is determined entirely by whether it sounds right, NOT by applying any rules at all, no rules whatsoever.
I instantly know if something is wrong, far faster than trying to apply some lousy grammatical rules.

the modern approach to language learning is in fact to de-emphasise grammar because for example the
best learning of language is by children who have no idea at all about grammar!


also for energetic communication of english you need to push the grammatical rules a little bit
beyond the breaking point,

basically if you follow english grammar too carefully the language loses its power of expression,
english is only powerful if you know when and where to break the rules

this is why slang develops eg "it sucks bigtime", because the grammar book just cannot
express such intense meaning.


you have to basically surf the grammar, and you can only do that if you learn from usage
and throw away your grammar book!

the BEST courses on learning languages are the "Teach yourself" series by Hodder and Staughton,
each lesson begins with a dialogue, you hit the road running,
and its totally contextual. They cover all aspects of a language including nonstandard scripts,
and they de-emphasise grammar.

A good example of what goes wrong if you use grammar, is that english uses a different tense (I ate) from german
(I have eaten). Because of this, people from the one language always get the tense wrong for the other language.
I only learnt this when I spent a lot of time in Germany, and started to learn when I had used the language incorrectly
from peoples reactions.

where the english person says "I ate some bread today" the german says "I have eaten some bread today"
(heute hab ich etwas brot gegessen)

in english you would only say that under special circumstances, eg if I asked:

have you eaten a lot of bread today?

you could reply:

no I have only eaten some bread today

but if I asked:

what did you do today?

you would reply:

I ate some bread

you would NOT say: I have eaten some bread,

this kind of subtlety can only be learnt from listening to usage, not from a grammar book.


basically grammar is a theoretical artefact and is NOT real, furthermore linguists have found that
grammar basically changes gradually with time, people start preferring a different tense to express the
same meaning. most languages start to move towards using participles (eating) in preference to declension (eats),

eg english prefers a participle for the present tense "I am eating" where german prefers
a participle for the past tense: "I have eaten" (ich hab gegessen), also german tends to
use passive tense where english uses active:

in english you would say: the medicine cured my illness

but germans NEVER say that, because technically the medicine's action is passive,

although technically incorrect the english usage is far more powerful,
which is exactly the point that you have to break the rules to get the power!

eg you could say: this music is melting my brain,

which flouts many rules of german, english is a very direct language,







some languages in fact only have 1 form of the past tense,

also languages like russian and latin dont use articles, they use relative pronouns instead of
the definite article which is more efficient.

where english uses: "I saw a cat, the cat was in the garden"

russian will use: "I saw cat, it was in garden"

latin will use: "I cat saw, it in garden was"

(something like that!)


english uses a participle for the present tense: I am going
german uses a declension: I go

english has many forms of the past tense:

I ate, I was eating, I have eaten, I have been eating,

you cannot tell from the grammar which is correct, because different languages use different forms
for the same usage,

you can only learn correct usage of english from hearing and reading the language being correctly used.


One further point: usage is far more sophisticated than grammar,

EVERY example usage involves MANY rules of grammar.

eg:

"I went to school yesterday"

that involves many rules of grammar:

word order: subject verb object adverb

verb declension: I went

personal pronoun: I

tense: past tense

case: I is nominative, school is probably dative

adverb: yesterday is an adverb of time (I think!)

you would spend an hour trying to say that from a grammar book!

eg the adverb "yesterday" is at quite a distance from the verb it qualifies "went",
I dont even know how you would explain that grammatically, dont know, dont care!

but I know which places you can use the adverb, simply because correct usages sound right,
incorrect usages sound wrong, thats all there is to it. actually the secret to correct english is
that it sounds right, if incorrect usage sounds better than correct usage you should use
the incorrect usage! It also depends on the accent, something which sounds good with one
accent sounds bad with another accent, which is why british english is different from american
english. its very important when learning any language to learn the accent well, because
once you have the accent correct a lot of stuff is determined just from the accent.


By the way all this grammatical terminology is from learning german, we were never taught english grammar.

anyway, the person who learns via REAL examples experiences far more grammar than the
person who tries to learn grammar


one other thing, if you visit Germany one of the most useful expressions is:

ich moechte

which is the polite way to ask for something in a shop, but grammatically that is quite complex

because it means "I would like", if you said "I want" that is regarded as rude,

its some form of conditional future tense, "would" is the past tense of the future verb "will"

which is very complicated grammar,

but you need to learn a lot of grammar before you learn "I would like",

the person who disregards grammar would learn this right at the start and not think about
the grammar,

some people say "ich haette gern" instead of "ich moechte" but that is also
equally complex,

How does this relate to music?

well, all that matters with music is that it sounds good!

the reason why a lot of the best pop music has been made by amateurs is because
they arent sidetracked by theory and focus just on whether it sounds good!

eg I found when practising the boxes of A minor pentatonic that sometimes I
would accidentally fret a note outside the box and sometimes this would
sound REALLY interesting, like something from some all time classic track.

it pays to think outside the box!

You are at GuitarMasterClass.net


Don't miss today's free lick. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!

Don't miss today's free blues, jazz & country licks. Plus all our lessons are packed with free content!


This post has been edited by richardb: Jan 17 2012, 04:36 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- richardb   Can Chords Be Replaced By Single Notes?   Jan 13 2012, 01:58 AM
- - Dinaga   The "deepest" note you're talking ab...   Jan 13 2012, 02:15 AM
|- - richardb   QUOTE (Dinaga @ Jan 13 2012, 01:15 AM) Th...   Jan 13 2012, 03:45 PM
|- - Dinaga   OK let's start from the beginning QUOTE any ...   Jan 13 2012, 04:18 PM
|- - richardb   its not that I want to avoid chords, but I bought ...   Jan 16 2012, 01:36 AM
nnn
nnn
nnn
- - Ben Higgins   Hi Dinaga has already summed the situation up ve...   Jan 13 2012, 08:28 AM
- - Cosmin Lupu   All good advice here from the B-man and Dinaga...   Jan 13 2012, 09:14 AM
- - PeteLucifersAngels   you could do so, but only a fool (like myself when...   Jan 13 2012, 10:16 AM
- - Ivan Milenkovic   Playing single notes is OK, but these are single n...   Jan 13 2012, 12:05 PM
- - Dinaga   Well mate, I gave you an insight why theory is imp...   Jan 16 2012, 07:08 AM
|- - richardb   QUOTE (Dinaga @ Jan 16 2012, 06:08 AM) We...   Jan 17 2012, 03:07 AM
nnn
- - Alexiaden93   OK let's stop "running around the porridg...   Jan 16 2012, 07:20 AM
- - Ben Higgins   Hi, I know what you mean.. all the preparation but...   Jan 16 2012, 08:25 AM
|- - Ben Higgins   QUOTE (Ben Higgins @ Jan 16 2012, 07:25 A...   Jan 17 2012, 09:31 AM
nnn
nnn
- - thefireball   Chords is the first thing I ever learned on guitar...   Jan 16 2012, 02:51 PM
- - thefireball   All this explanation is really unnecessary.   Jan 17 2012, 04:40 AM
|- - Dinaga   QUOTE (thefireball @ Jan 17 2012, 04:40 A...   Jan 18 2012, 12:00 AM
|- - richardb   QUOTE (Dinaga @ Jan 17 2012, 11:00 PM) Yo...   Jan 18 2012, 12:41 AM
|- - Alexiaden93   QUOTE (richardb @ Jan 18 2012, 12:41 AM) ...   Jan 18 2012, 12:59 AM
nnn
nnn
nnn
- - Alexiaden93   Learning grammar before learning to communicate is...   Jan 17 2012, 04:56 AM
|- - richardb   I'll keep this brief as its near the edge of r...   Jan 18 2012, 01:43 AM
||- - Alexiaden93   QUOTE (richardb @ Jan 18 2012, 01:43 AM) ...   Jan 18 2012, 01:57 AM
nnn
|- - richardb   QUOTE (Alexiaden93 @ Jan 17 2012, 03:56 A...   Jan 19 2012, 03:06 PM
nnn
- - Cosmin Lupu   Mates, we live in a free world and everyone can se...   Jan 17 2012, 08:58 AM
- - Fran   My 2 cents, learn the basic open chords and barre ...   Jan 17 2012, 05:01 PM
- - thefireball   ARGG! Can somebody PLEASE stop?! This is ...   Jan 18 2012, 06:31 AM
|- - Cosmin Lupu   QUOTE (thefireball @ Jan 18 2012, 05:31 A...   Jan 18 2012, 08:36 AM
|- - Sollesnes   QUOTE (thefireball @ Jan 18 2012, 06:31 A...   Jan 19 2012, 01:02 AM
nnn
- - Frederik   Keep on !!! You can discover new world...   Jan 19 2012, 03:31 PM
- - Frederik   Gotta say i agree with alexiaden. Theory will make...   Jan 19 2012, 11:02 PM
- - Alexiaden93   So... What is your current status, Richard? Do not...   Jan 20 2012, 06:55 PM
nnn
nnn


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 




RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 05:09 AM