Would You Get Rid Of Yours?, Samantha Fish |
|
Would You Get Rid Of Yours?, Samantha Fish |
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2021, 07:42 AM |
Okay she eventually added a few pedals Dahl in but would you do away with your peak board /multi fx?
I enjoy going straight into my Fender Blues Deluxe Reissue sometimes, but I don't think it's do away with my fx. I'm not a working guitarist though but it would be interesting to hear your opinions. https://www.guitarplayer.com/news/samantha-...r-guitar-player -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 11 2021, 12:50 PM |
.... it would be great to practice more with just an amp 😎 Yeah, there's something special, almost organic about playing through a good amp, sometimes I can lose an hour improvising to a slow blues E minor backing with my SRV Strat and the Fender amp, it just feels so sweet. -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 11 2021, 01:20 PM |
Okay she eventually added a few pedals Dahl in but would you do away with your peak board /multi fx? I enjoy going straight into my Fender Blues Deluxe Reissue sometimes, but I don't think it's do away with my fx. I'm not a working guitarist though but it would be interesting to hear your opinions. https://www.guitarplayer.com/news/samantha-...r-guitar-player I haven't really read the article, so just a quick glance on your post is what I'm replying to. An interesting take is how Tesseract (and probably others) have a midi-programmed setup for live use, where they don't press pedals to change patch etc. At least in the past they did that. It's pre-programmed. I.e. song starts, click track runs through a DAW live, you have midi set up to auto-switch to the patch used for clean, rhythm, solo etc. whenever needed and it just all runs through the DAW. Very easy to set up actually, and I'm suprised it's not used more. Relatively easy anyway. You just have your song set up with the markers, sections or whatever, then at say 2:13 you program a switch from "rhythm guitar" to "lead guitar" that handles the switch for you when you reach that point of the song. And since everyone is on the same click track and DAW it all lines up for everyone. I'd do it that way. No need to worry about dancing around on pedals, which has never interested me that much. About 14:25 or so in this video: This post has been edited by Caelumamittendum: Sep 11 2021, 01:25 PM |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 11 2021, 01:50 PM |
I haven't really read the article, so just a quick glance on your post is what I'm replying to. An interesting take is how Tesseract (and probably others) have a midi-programmed setup for live use, where they don't press pedals to change patch etc. At least in the past they did that. It's pre-programmed. I.e. song starts, click track runs through a DAW live, you have midi set up to auto-switch to the patch used for clean, rhythm, solo etc. whenever needed and it just all runs through the DAW. Very easy to set up actually, and I'm suprised it's not used more. Relatively easy anyway. You just have your song set up with the markers, sections or whatever, then at say 2:13 you program a switch from "rhythm guitar" to "lead guitar" that handles the switch for you when you reach that point of the song. And since everyone is on the same click track and DAW it all lines up for everyone. I'd do it that way. No need to worry about dancing around on pedals, which has never interested me that much. About 14:25 or so in this video: She didn't get rid of her pedal board because of the dancing around on pedals per SE but because she wanted to be more pure -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 11 2021, 09:36 PM |
I always record direct, without effects. As the FX are all virtual in THU so it's really just recording a dry signal that one can "reamp" at any point during the process. I like to hear the effects whilst playing even if I alter them later -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 12 2021, 07:51 AM |
I'd think that's the normal approach when using plugins. You have it running, but you still only record the dry signal, as you're not "burning" the plugin's sound into the track. I'm almost sure that's what Todd means too, but I could be wrong Ahh, it came across to me as though Todd plays clean when recording and adds effects afterwards, I'm probably completely wrong -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Sep 12 2021, 09:49 PM |
Well, I am recording clean But I have the plugin on as i record so I can hear the fx etc. Sorry for the confusion. No worries, I can be a bit of a plank at times -------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||