U.s. Supreme Court Legalizes Gay Marriage In Every State |
|
U.s. Supreme Court Legalizes Gay Marriage In Every State |
|
|
|
|
Jul 21 2015, 08:33 AM |
As previous, discussion is unfortunately "bit pointless" because in a world where you can order and pay for research, there is always a "research" contradicting another research.
I was interested in that topic some time ago, and from my and my girlfriends knowledge (and she studied how to evaluate the way research was conducted) research suggesting that same sex parenting is inferior proved to be conducted in a more professional way than the quasi research of the LBGT movement. Here are three links: http://www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~pnc/allen-ss-grad.pdf http://www.ionainstitute.eu/pdfs/1-s2.0-S0...000610-main.pdf http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2500537 I am more familiar with my own language articles about this topic, co can't provide more. What I think about the whole thing: First of all, I am an evil "libertarian". I think the government should not be interested in private stuff. That means that in general I would not forbid same sex couples to marry or to adopt children, because I deny the government the power to do so. It is a matter between private people, if someone wants to "get rid off" a child, and someone wants to adopt it it is "okay". BUT - we live in a pathetic world of social government, where people are treated like retards that can't decide for themselves. The government wants to decide in our name, and "take care" of us. In this pathological situation I demand proper "taking care of". And by that I understand better solving of a "unwanted children" problem than giving them to the inferior (for the good of the child) same sex couples. Build "super orphanages" or (now you may take a seat because I will write something very controversial) introduce "child permissions" - if you don't meet certain criteria, don't pass a special exam, are to lazy and stupid to have children, than you are not allowed to have them. If you won't respect the law, you pay big fines, or just straight out go to jail or work camp. It is a simple choice between freedom and slavery. I want freedom, but if I am to live in a place where decisions are made somewhere else, let those decisions be decisive and wise, not politically correct... |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Jul 21 2015, 09:39 AM |
I'd rather a child be loved by a same sex couple than unloved by a non same sex couple. Given the choice of the child being with loving parents of either same sex or non same sex I would first go with the child being with both loving biological parents, after that I have no preference other than a loving supportive home.
-------------------- SEE MY GMC CERTIFICATE “Success is not obtained overnight. It comes in instalments; you get a little bit today, a little bit tomorrow until the whole package is given out. The day you procrastinate, you lose that day's success.” Israelmore Ayivor |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Jul 22 2015, 07:25 AM |
I'm an Evil Libertarian as well I"m glad to read that we are on the same page about folks that want to start families being able to and it not being the govt's business. sadly in our country, the Govt has stuck their hand in for quite some time to make folks born 'non-straight" to be a bit "less than" in terms of their civil liberties and basic rights including marriage. It's really quite shameful that it's taken this long for the supreme court to recognize that if folks wanna marry, the govt should give them all the same treatment, gay or straight.
I read some of the research and it did agree with your point that same sex kids have a harder time in general. I have seen this with my own eyes actually with a lesbian couple who had a child. During it's early school years, the child "invented" a father figure since everyone else at school had one. He made up a name, job, hobbies and this fake dad was very real for the kid. TO be sure, raising a child with two moms or two dads presents it own issues. Then again raising children in general presents issues. Back to the govt. I think they should stay out of it in terms of telling people they can't have an adopted child. If a non straight couple wants to adopt, I say go for it. I don't want kids myself, but some folks do, so gay or straight, they should be able to have them or adopt them or whatever works for them In the end i think we are closer on views that I originally thought As previous, discussion is unfortunately "bit pointless" because in a world where you can order and pay for research, there is always a "research" contradicting another research. I was interested in that topic some time ago, and from my and my girlfriends knowledge (and she studied how to evaluate the way research was conducted) research suggesting that same sex parenting is inferior proved to be conducted in a more professional way than the quasi research of the LBGT movement. Here are three links: http://www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~pnc/allen-ss-grad.pdf http://www.ionainstitute.eu/pdfs/1-s2.0-S0...000610-main.pdf http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2500537 I am more familiar with my own language articles about this topic, co can't provide more. What I think about the whole thing: First of all, I am an evil "libertarian". I think the government should not be interested in private stuff. That means that in general I would not forbid same sex couples to marry or to adopt children, because I deny the government the power to do so. It is a matter between private people, if someone wants to "get rid off" a child, and someone wants to adopt it it is "okay". BUT - we live in a pathetic world of social government, where people are treated like retards that can't decide for themselves. The government wants to decide in our name, and "take care" of us. In this pathological situation I demand proper "taking care of". And by that I understand better solving of a "unwanted children" problem than giving them to the inferior (for the good of the child) same sex couples. Build "super orphanages" or (now you may take a seat because I will write something very controversial) introduce "child permissions" - if you don't meet certain criteria, don't pass a special exam, are to lazy and stupid to have children, than you are not allowed to have them. If you won't respect the law, you pay big fines, or just straight out go to jail or work camp. It is a simple choice between freedom and slavery. I want freedom, but if I am to live in a place where decisions are made somewhere else, let those decisions be decisive and wise, not politically correct... |
|
|
||